KCR, Harish Rao get relief as HC suspends lower court’s order allowing revision case against them


K. Chandrashekhar Rao. File

K. Chandrashekhar Rao. File
| Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

Former Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao of BRS and his former Cabinet colleague T. Harish Rao got relief with the Telangana High Court on Tuesday (December 24, 2024) suspending the order of the Principal Sessions Judge of Jayashankar district allowing a criminal revision petition against them.

The judge issued notice to Nagavelli Rajalingamurthy of the district, who filed a private complaint with a local court there accusing the former CM, the former Minister and others of indulging in corruption during the construction of the Medigadda barrage as part of Kaleshwaram project. The judge observed that the scope of courts to accept revision petitions was limited.

The judge was hearing a criminal petition filed by KCR and Harish Rao seeking a direction to quash PSJ’s order allowing the revision petition filed by Rajalingamurthy. Initially, the petitioner filed a private complaint with the local Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Firsts Class Magistrate under Section 156 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order to the local police to investigate into his allegations of corruption in Medigadda barrage construction.

He arrayed KCR, Harish Rao and other top officials as accused in the complaint. The JFCM, however, dismissed the complaint citing lack of jurisdiction. Challenging this, the petitioner filed a revision petition before the PSJ who allowed it.

The former CM and the Minister, who filed the criminal petition in the HC, contended that the PSJ had no power to allow the revision petition once the JFCM dismissed it on the point of jurisdiction. They maintained the PSJ’s observation that not allowing the revision petition would send the wrong message to society and that the revision petition was not numbered to instil confidence in judiciary were uncalled for.

They contended that the PSJ did not record any finding in the order that the JFCM’s dismissal of the petition suffered from illegality or impropriety. The matter was posted to January 7, 2024 for next hearing.



Source link

spot_img

More from this stream

Recomended

Lt. Governor, CM pay tributes to Vajpayee in PuducherryTelangana food safety department conducted over 4,600 inspections, levying fines of ₹78 lakhCongress must apologise for insulting Ambedkar, says Fadnavis Sparsha Darshan at Srisailam to be stopped on January 1Microsoft Outlook और Teams की सर्विसेज में दिक्कतें, यूजर्स परेशान, कंपनी ने कही ये बातपुलिस की पूछताछ के बाद अल्लू अर्जुन ने उठाया बड़ा कदम, पीड़ित परिवार को दिए इतने करोड़!Govt. should announce legally backed minimum procurement price for food crops, says Prakash Kammaradi‘Damaged ECR road in Ramanathapuram district poses danger to lives of road users’Coordinator inspects arrangements for the Chief Minister’s visit to ENC Operational Demonstration in Visakhapatnam on January 4National Christian Council thanks Andhra Pradesh CM N. Chandrababu Naidu for resuming honorarium payments to pastorsCentre allows 99.5k tons of onion exports to 6 neighbouring nationsCentre lifts onion export ban, but conditions applyRoad transport and highways team inspects site for proposed grade separator in PuducherryElection Commission nod taken before lifting ban on onion exports: Govt sourcesWater level in Mullaperiyar dam stands at 128.85 on Dec. 25, 2024Three more arrested in Joy Jamima honeytrap case in VisakhapatnamGunfight between armed groups in fringe village of Manipur’s Imphal valleyHamas says 'new' Israeli conditions delaying agreement on Gaza ceasefireChickpea imports unlikely to ease prices, yellow peas seen as substituteIdukki gets its first women-led cardamom auction company