South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters
South Korea’s acting leader said on Thursday (December 19, 2024) he would veto a spate of contentious bills sponsored by the main Opposition party, deepening political strife in the wake of Parliament’s impeachment of President Yoon Suk Yeol.
The ruling and Opposition parties have been bickering over how much authority Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, the country’s No. 2 Official, has assumed since the Opposition-controlled National Assembly last Saturday (December 19, 2024) voted to suspend Mr. Yoon’s presidential powers over his short-lived Dec. 3 martial law. The Constitutional Court is to determine whether to formally dismiss the conservative Yoon as President or reinstate him.
Law enforcement Authorities are also separately investigating whether Mr. Yoon’s martial law enforcement amounted to rebellion. Mr. Yoon’s defence Minister, Police Chief and several other Military Commanders have already been arrested over the case. The main liberal Opposition Democratic Party earlier considered impeaching Mr. Han as well for failing to stop Mr. Yoon’s martial law declaration, but shelved the idea after he became acting leader.
Four of the six bills to be vetoed by Mr. Han were meant to introduce greater state financial assistance programs for the country’s agriculture and fisheries industries.
The most contentious bill is the Grain Management Act, which would require the Government to buy surplus rice if the price drops too sharply to protect the country’s farming industry and promote its food sovereignty. Mr. Han said the bill would cause “immense” financial burdens on the Government and eventually lead to further drops in rice prices.
Another controversial bill is the National Assembly Testimony Appraisal Act, which would give lawmakers more power to request people to attend Parliament hearings and submit documents. Under the proposed legislation, individuals could no longer decline such requests by citing the protection of trade secrets or personal information.
The Democratic Party said the bill is necessary to determine the full details of Mr. Yoon’s martial law decree. But Mr. Han said the bill would likely infringe upon people’s privacy and that there are concerns among business leaders that key technology and company secrets could be leaked.
“I’m heavy-hearted because I’ve asked the National Assembly to discuss and act on the six bills again at a time when we desperately need cooperation among the Government and the ruling and Opposition parties,” Mr. Han said in televised comments at the start of a Cabinet Council meeting on Thursday (Dec. 19,2024). “But the Government should make a responsible decision that prioritises the principles of the Constitution and the future of our country.”
Democratic lawmaker and spokesperson Noh Jongmyun quickly criticised Mr. Han, warning him “not to cross a line,” adding, “We’ll immediately drag him down if he’s found to have collaborated with the rebellion.”
Observers earlier speculated the Democratic Party would reconsider impeaching Mr. Han if he vetoed the bills.
Another source of contention between the rival parties is whether PM Han has the right to appoint three vacant justices’ seats at the Constitutional Court, as filling the vacancies could affect the court’s decision on Mr. Yoon.
The martial law enactment lasted only six hours, but it caused huge political turmoil in South Korea and set off alarms from its neighbours and diplomatic partners. Mr. Yoon sent hundreds of troops to the National Assembly to block its vote on his decree. But many lawmakers managed to enter a parliament hall and unanimously voted it down, forcing Mr. Yoon’s Cabinet to lift it.
Mr. Yoon has defended his decree as an act of governance, saying it was a warning to the Democratic Party, which he said has been using its parliamentary majority to obstruct his agenda.
Meeting with foreign media on Thursday (Dec 19, 2024), Seok Dong-hyeon, a lawyer and spokesperson for Mr. Yoon’s emerging legal team, echoed Mr. Yoon’s assertion that his short-lived power grab didn’t amount to a rebellion. Mr. Seok said, Mr. Yoon did not intend to paralyse the Parliament and denied claims the President ordered the military to arrest his political opponents, including Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung.
“Regarding the charges of rebellion, he never even thought about it, so he cannot possibly agree to such an accusation,” Mr. Seok said.
“What kind of a rebellion is announced through a press conference broadcast to citizens, media and the whole world, as if he was saying, ‘I’m now about to commit a rebellion?'” Mr. Seok said. “When the National Assembly followed the constitutional procedure to lift martial law after two or three hours, we abided by that procedure.”
He said Mr. Yoon may appear in the Constitutional Court to directly defend his case. When asked whether Mr. Yoon would continue to ignore law enforcement’s requests to question him and search his office, Mr. Seok declined to give a specific answer, saying these matters would be handled by Mr. Yoon’s legal team, which he said is nearly assembled.
Published – December 19, 2024 01:21 pm IST