KU senators’ forum alleges irregularities in data handling and evaluation


The Kannur University Senators’ Forum has raised serious allegations against the university’s administration, accusing it of compromising its autonomy and acting under the verbal instructions of the Higher Education Minister.

The forum claimed that the university had handed over student data to the Maharashtra-based MKCL without signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in violation of norms.

While other universities resisted sharing data, Kannur University (KU) allegedly shared it, which the forum termed a betrayal of students’ academic interests. The forum described the Vice-Chancellor’s alleged involvement in the matter as “unfortunate,” reflecting poorly on the institution’s governance.

The release of the first-semester results of the varsity’s four-year undergraduate programme also came under scrutiny. The forum came down on the varsity for publishing results prematurely on the Principal’s portal, bypassing official protocols. The blame placed on principals and colleges for distributing results was deemed “ridiculous” compared to the alleged lapses by MKCL, the software company managing the results. The forum claimed that the varsity did not give any prior information regarding the trial run.

The forum sought an investigation into whether external agencies linked to foreign universities influenced the situation, possibly aiming to diminish the university’s credibility.

The forum also highlighted alleged irregularities in the first-semester evaluation process. Teachers reportedly conducted assessments using students’ register numbers, rather than anonymised codes, raising concerns about potential bias and mark manipulation. The direct uploading of marks by teachers into the Maharashtra company’s software was termed as a breach of transparency and accountability.

The forum accused the Higher Education Minister of pressuring universities into transactions with MKCL, and KU was the only one to fully implement the directive. This, they argued, violated Section 25(15) of the University Act and demanded a thorough investigation into the matter.



Source link

spot_img

More from this stream

Recomended

SolarSquare raises $40 million in Series B funding roundTransUnion CIBIL appoints Bhavesh Jain as MD & CEOAshok Leyland set to hike CV prices by 3% from January 2025Parliament Ambedkar row: Congress to hold press conference in 150 cities demanding Amit Shah’s resignationPassenger Vehicle dispatches rise 4% in November as demand sustains post-festive period: SIAM‘Today, mathematics is not only necessary in daily life but pervasive’Tamil Nadu government provides interest subsidy to modernise textile millsSpiceJet says cleared ₹160 crore worth pending employee provident fund duesProf. Neena Gupta: ‘Not every problem will give you a eureka moment‘ National Mathematics DaySwitzerland withdraws MFN status from IndiaASSOCHAM Secretary General Deepak Sood steps downMining Industry in A.P. faces neglect amidst widespread closures and cartelisation; FEMMI urges CM to initiate immediate actionHow would a carbon market function? | ExplainedTwo-thirds of French already unhappy with new PM Bayrou: pollNBFC Bazel International acquires footwear maker SR Industries through resolution processNo timeline for introduction of regulatory guidelines for virtual digital assets industry: MoS FinancePornHub पर लॉगइन नहीं कर पाएंगे ये लोग, एडल्ट वेबसाइट ने जारी क‍िया नोट‍िस | Hindi News, Tech newsIndia's Tata faces pressure in Starbucks joint venture as consumers cut backIndia's solar energy agency changes bidding policy after Adani bribery allegations, says sourceU.S. case against India's Gautam Adani appears strong but extradition unlikely, experts say