SC suggests setting up courtroom in jail for Kashmiri separatist Yasin Malik amid security concerns


JKLF Leader Yasin Malik.

JKLF Leader Yasin Malik.
| Photo Credit: R.V. Moorthy

The Supreme Court on Thursday (November 21, 2024) orally suggested setting up a courtroom in jail in Delhi for Kashmiri separatist Yasin Malik in the face of strong objection raised by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to a Jammu court order allowing his physical presence in a criminal trial connected to the killing of four Air Force personnel in 1989.

Justice A.S. Oka said a fair trial was afforded to even 26/11 Mumbai attack terrorist Ajmal Kasab in response to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s submission that Malik was not “just another terrorist”.

Mr. Mehta, for the Central agency, said “We, that is the government, cannot go by the book in this case”.

The Solicitor General submitted that Malik was playing tricks with the courts by insisting on cross-examining witnesses in the trial instead of keeping a lawyer. The law officer said Malik had been in contact with Pakistani militant and founder of terrorist organisation Lashkar-e-Taiba Hafiz Saeed.

Opposing the Jammu court order, the top law officer cautioned that taking Malik to Jammu would be a security risk. Already, he said, a witness in the case has been killed.

Justice Oka raised doubts about online connectivity in Jammu while exploring the idea of facilitating Malik’s virtual presence i. the Jammu court trial. Mr. Mehta assured the Bench that connectivity was good.

“We can set up a courtroom in Delhi in jail…” Justice Oka proposed while Mr. Mehta raised no objection to it.

The court highlighted that witnesses in the case would require security, and asked for details about the arrangements to protect them.

Mr. Mehta mentioned how Malik was once brought in person to the Supreme Court last year in July after the Tihar Jail had misinterpreted a judicial order. The visit had caused quite a furore and led to sharp remarks from the Bench.

The Bench adjourned the case to November 28, giving time to the CBI to amend its petition and implead the other accused persons as respondents in the case.

The Supreme Court had last year stayed the Operation Jammu Special Court order allowing Malik’s physical presence at the trial to cross examine witnesses in the case.



Source link

spot_img

More from this stream

Recomended

Six of family sentenced to three-year imprisonment for land fraudPremallatha condemns attack on lawyer in HosurVolcano erupts in Iceland’s Reykjanes Peninsula for seventh time in a yearClimate funding divisions laid bare as COP29 deadline loomsStocks of Adani Group going into a tailspin raises concern over Vizhinjam seaport development in KeralaMadras HC Chief Justice breaks with tradition, delivers address to bid adieu to brother judgeभारत में 42 साल के हीरो की है सबसे ज्यादा फीस, 1 मूवी के लेता 300 करोड़Rahul Gandhi demands arrest of Gautam AdaniCM calls on Union Finance Minister with request to enhance NABARD funding for KarnatakaWhy has Gautam Adani been indicted in the U.S. over alleged $250mn bribery scheme?Adani Group: U.S. Department of Justice allegations baselessAdani Group: U.S. Department of Justice allegations baselessRana Daggubati to lend voice to Hindi, Tamil, and Telugu dubs of Solo Leveling Season 2Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy outline plans for mass regulatory cuts under TrumpCafe Dori is a cafe inside Nappa Dori in HyderabadThe Hindu AI Summit 2024: ‘Global consensus is the need of the hour to face challenges in using AI in governance’Delhi Assembly polls: AAP releases first list of 11 candidatesSri Lanka's new Parliament convened; speaker and others electedRussia and China oppose changing the Kenya-led force in Haiti to a U.N. peacekeeping missionA.P. Assembly passes resolution for establishment of High Court Bench in Kurnool