Food delivery agents and dependents find it hard to get insurance claims cleared


Early in May this year, 42-year-old Ajay (name changed), a delivery agent with online food delivery aggregator Swiggy in Thiruvananthapuram, was returning after a delivery when he met with an accident. He sustained serious injuries including a broken rib. After a one month stay in hospital and two months of rest at home, he rejoined work recently to take care of daily expenses. But the company has rejected his insurance claim.

“I have sent my medical records from the Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram as well as other relevant documents for the insurance claim. But the claim was rejected by the insurance company with which Swiggy has an arrangement. My team leader told me that I should have contacted the company’s officials online as soon as the accident happened. How is anyone supposed to do that,” asks Ajay.

In the case of Mahesh (name changed), the claim for an accident which happened during a delivery in May this year has not yet been rejected, but there has been no response from the insurance company. Although he had sustained serious injuries on his arm and head, he has managed to recover enough to rejoin work.

Food delivery agent and their dependents have been finding it increasingly hard to get insurance claims for injuries or death caused by accidents or other reasons. According to several agents that The Hindu talked to, their claims have been getting rejected for flimsy reasons.

22-year-old Ashwin, who used to be a delivery worker with Swiggy, died in an accident on February 23. According to his sister P.Aswani, the company initially rejected the insurance claim citing that he had worked only till January 20 and that insurance claims can be provided only for those who have worked within seven days prior to the accident.

“We went to the bank in which he had an account and got a statement, which showed that the last transaction from the company to his account was on February 20. There has been no response after we sent this particular detail,” says Aswani.

According to the delivery agents, the company changes the criteria for awarding insurance on its whims. In the case of a 19-year old delivery agent who died in an accident in October, the criteria stipulated was that the agent should have worked within five days, instead of the seven days cited in previous cases. The few cases where delivery agents have received money has happened through the constant follow up from the workers’ union.

The Kerala wing of the All India Gig Workers’ Union is planning to go on a protest soon citing various issues, including the rejection of insurance claims. Delivery agents say that the rates have not been increased in the past few years despite the increase in fuel costs. The company officials were not available for comment.



Source link

spot_img

More from this stream

Recomended

India's FDI squeeze - India TodayHyderabad | 1.6 crore population with 85 lakh vehicles in HYDRAA’s jurisdictionRupee rises 6 paise to close at 84.44 against U.S. dollarComplete widening of Nelagadaranahalli road in 2 months: BBMP chiefTamil Nadu government announces list of public holidays for 2025Regulatory panel warns private college managements in A.P. against unlawful practicesKTR demands Congress Govt in Telangana to scrap all deals with Adani Group‘The Colours Within’ movie review: Naoko Yamada’s technicolour spectacle is a tender treat‘Waack Girls’ series review: Taraporevala’s dance around Kolkata has its heart in the right place, but not much elseTelangana govt to form joint consultative committee on industries with CIIT.N. Minister I. Periyasamy moves Madras High Court to quash TNHB plot allotment caseस्त्री 2 नहीं, 2024 की ये है सबसे डरावनी फिल्म, देखने बैठे तो जगह-जगह से निकलेगा पसीना, नहीं छोड़ पाएंगे क्लाइमैक्सGovernment funding 28 innovative ideas to address sharp volatility in retail prices of tomatoSC orders monitoring Delhi’s entry points to check truck banI Want To Talk movie review: Abhishek Bachchan sells resilience in this self-help guideAdani bribery case: Jagan has brought disgrace to A.P. and YSR family, says Y. S. SharmilaOmar chairs first cabinet meeting in Jammu, discusses reservation, employment, recruitmentsK.S. Eshwarappa asks govt to resolve BPL card issue within a weekPM Modi security lapse case: Supreme Court refuses to entertain Punjab’s request for statements of witnessesBJD says allegations of Adani paying bribe to Odisha govt officials 'false'