Judge cancels court deadlines in Trump’s 2020 election case after his presidential win


The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case canceled any remaining court deadlines while prosecutors assess the “the appropriate course going forward” in light of the Republican’s presidential victory. FIle photo

The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case canceled any remaining court deadlines while prosecutors assess the “the appropriate course going forward” in light of the Republican’s presidential victory. FIle photo
| Photo Credit: KEVIN WURM

WASHINGTON

The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case canceled any remaining court deadlines Friday while prosecutors assess the “the appropriate course going forward” in light of the Republican’s presidential victory.

Special Counsel Jack Smith charged Trump last year with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and illegally hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate. But Smith’s team has been evaluating how to wind down the two federal cases before the president-elect takes office because of longstanding Justice Department policy that says sitting presidents cannot be prosecuted, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.

Trump’s victory over Vice President Kamala Harris means that the Justice Department believes he can no longer face prosecution in accordance with department legal opinions meant to shield presidents from criminal charges while in office.

Trump has criticized both cases as politically motivated, and has said he would fire Smith “within two seconds” of taking office.

In a court filing Friday in the 2020 election case, Smith’s team asked to cancel any upcoming court deadlines, saying it needs “time to assess this unprecedented circumstance and determine the appropriate course going forward consistent with Department of Justice policy.”

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan quickly granted the request, and ordered prosecutors to file court papers with their “proposed course for this case” by Dec. 2.

Trump had been scheduled to stand trial in March in Washington, where more than 1,000 of his supporters have been convicted of charges for their roles in the Capitol riot. But his case was halted as Trump pursued his sweeping claims of immunity from prosecution that ultimately landed before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court in July ruled that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution, and sent the case back to Chutkan to determine which of the the allegations in the indictment can move forward.

The classified documents case has been stalled since July when a Trump-appointed judge, Aileen Cannon, dismissed it on grounds that Smith was illegally appointed. Smith has appealed to the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where the request to revive the case is pending. Even as Smith looks to withdraw the documents case against Trump, he would seem likely to continue to challenge Cannon’s ruling on the legality of his appointment given the precedent such a ruling would create.



Source link

spot_img

More from this stream

Recomended

Retired Madras High Court judge to probe Tamil University appointmentsCM Revanth inspects Telangana Thalli statue installation works at SecretariatDr. Soumya Swaminathan lecture in UoH on MondayHere are the big stories from Karnataka todayInternational conference on information security commencesTamil Nadu sees highest growth in GST collections among comparable States in first half of 2024-25Govt notifies telecom cyber security rules; sets timelines for telcos to report security incidentsPresident Droupadi Murmu highlights India’s cultural heritage and calls for unityWicked movie review: Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande waltz into our hearts in this gravity-defying extravaganza North Korea's Kim accuses U.S. of stoking tension, warns of nuclear war, state media saysRailways begins nation-wide online registration of applications for Divyangjan smart cardBengaluru's great thirstRajkot tragedy | Flagrant violationsOdisha | The Majhi makeoverHathras stampede | A litany of lapsesSupreme Court takes note of The Hindu article on increase in stubble-burning areas in Punjab and Haryana, orders CAQM to submit reportThe Wayanad blunders - India TodayInterview with Bhajan Lal Sharma: 'Politics and ideology is one thing, I like restraint in language'Union Minister Bandi Sanjay visits Central Forensic Science Laboratory in HyderabadRajasthan CM Bhajan Lal Sharma | Tackling teething troubles